Precision Engineering for People.
Replace gut-feel screening with rubric-graded, AI-drafted evaluations — reasoning shown, every decision recorded to an audit trail, every score confirmed by a person before it counts. Built for engineering teams who need to trust the number, not just see it.
Assessment review
AI grade
8 / 10 — meets the rubric on 3 of 4 criteria
Scoring rubric
// 01 How grading works
Engineered for Truth. Built to Scale.
No black box. You define the rubric, the AI grades every answer against it and shows its reasoning, and every score routes through a person before it counts.
Question builder · AI-assisted draft
Design a notification system that scales to 5M daily active users. Walk through your approach to fan-out and delivery guarantees.
maps to: Scalability
Question Studio
Draft rubric-aligned questions straight from the role description. Every question is reviewed before it ever reaches a candidate.
Hiring Policy · rule
When
An assessment is graded
Then
Route to a reviewer
Assign the candidate to a specific team member.
Hiring Policy
Define rules that route candidates and notify your team as assessment events happen — anything that affects a candidate holds for a human decision first.
Candidate session · integrity log
Assessment Integrity
Timing, session integrity, and copy-paste guards on every run — no webcam, no biometrics.
Cohort comparison
Candidate A
Data-store choice
Met
Failure modes
Met
Candidate B
Data-store choice
Met
Failure modes
Not shown
Deep Cohort Benchmarking
Every candidate answers the same frozen question set, scored against the same rubric — so results are comparable across your whole applicant pool, not just defensible one at a time.
// 02 The candidate experience
Designed for Real Engineering Work
Preview the candidate environment across every technical modality. Fluid, distraction-free, and calibrated to assess pragmatic problem solving.
Assessment · in progress
Section 01 · Distributed systems
12:40Question 03 of 22
A service must stay available for reads during a network partition, even if some replicas serve slightly stale data. Which trade-off does this describe?
32% complete · answers save as you go
// 03 The hiring loop
The Precision Evaluation Loop
One flow, five steps — you're in the loop at every decision point.
- 1
Create
Post a job, add or bulk-import candidates (CSV). AI drafts rubric-aligned questions from the role — you review and approve before they go live.
- 2
Invite
Candidates take a timed assessment, monitored for tampering, on their own time — so the answers you're grading are actually theirs.
- 3
AI grades
AI grades each answer against your rubric and shows its reasoning.
- 4
You decide
You review every result — accept, reject, or ask for a regrade — with a rationale recorded to the audit trail.
- 5
Pipeline
Track candidates from assessment through your hiring decision.
- 1
Create
Post a job, add or bulk-import candidates (CSV). AI drafts rubric-aligned questions from the role — you review and approve before they go live.
- 2
Invite
Candidates take a timed assessment, monitored for tampering, on their own time — so the answers you're grading are actually theirs.
- 3
AI grades
AI grades each answer against your rubric and shows its reasoning.
- 4
You decide
You review every result — accept, reject, or ask for a regrade — with a rationale recorded to the audit trail.
- 5
Pipeline
Track candidates from assessment through your hiring decision.
Ready to see the AI grade in action?
See how AI-drafted questions and rubric-graded answers change your hiring loop — book a walkthrough on your own open roles.